<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Oregon &#8220;LEEDs&#8221; the pack in green building.</title>
	<link>http://southwaterfront.com/green_living/metropolis_mag_leed_article/</link>
	<description>South Waterfront, Portland Oregon</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 04:36:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://southwaterfront.com/green_living/metropolis_mag_leed_article/#comment-440</link>
		<author>Andrew</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 22:15:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://southwaterfront.com/green_living/metropolis_mag_leed_article/#comment-440</guid>
		<description>Sure, Oregon is 4th in total number of LEED certified buildings. A more appropriate measure, however, would be to look at number of LEED buildings per capita. The other three states that lead Oregon in total building numbers all have greater populations and most likely greater resources to draw upon. When evaluating LEED buildings per capita, you'll notice we're at the top of the list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure, Oregon is 4th in total number of LEED certified buildings. A more appropriate measure, however, would be to look at number of LEED buildings per capita. The other three states that lead Oregon in total building numbers all have greater populations and most likely greater resources to draw upon. When evaluating LEED buildings per capita, you&#8217;ll notice we&#8217;re at the top of the list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
